Amazon, Inc. v. Amazon, Inc. (In re Amazon, Inc.)
This case arose out of a class-action suit for unpaid wages brought by employees at an Amazon warehouse. The employees claimed they were entitled to compensation under the Pennsylvania Minimum
This case arose out of a class-action suit for unpaid wages brought by employees at an Amazon warehouse. The employees claimed they were entitled to compensation under the Pennsylvania Minimum
Dondero, the chief of police, sued after the Township closed the police department he worked for. He alleged retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and violations of substantive and
A teacher took out a loan against her pension. The pension fund was directed to withdraw payments from her paycheck to satisfy the loan automatically. The teacher resigned months later,
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that a former employee could pass the summary judgment stage of a suit brought under the Law Against Discrimination by alleging that his supervisor
In Cty. of Allegheny v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Butkus), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court reviewed an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which granted Butkus’s Petition to Modify Compensation
In Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court confronted an issue of first impression: whether “no-hire” provisions in contracts are enforceable. Here, a transportation logistics
In Beaver Valley Slag, Inc. v. Marchionda (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board), Employer, Guardian, and Claimant cross-petitioned the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court to review the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board’s order. Therein, the
In Borough of Franklin v. Smith, the New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that a township may subpoena a police officer and compel him to testify in the municipality’s case-in-chief in
In Ciripompa v. Bd. of Educ., the New Jersey Appellate Division heard a plaintiff teacher’s appeal from the Commissioner of Education’s final order that permitted a school board to deduct unemployment
Plaintiff Goldfarb claimed that Defendant Solimine reneged on a promise of employment after Plaintiff quit his job to accept a promised position managing the Defendant’s family’s sizeable investment portfolio. After
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.