Ripp v. Hudson Cty.
The New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that the judge of workers’ compensation (JWC) erred “in her expansive application of N.J.S.A. 34:15-28.2,” and, additionally, she abused her discretion in “imposing a
The New Jersey Appellate Division ruled that the judge of workers’ compensation (JWC) erred “in her expansive application of N.J.S.A. 34:15-28.2,” and, additionally, she abused her discretion in “imposing a
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which affirmed a referee’s order denying unemployment compensation benefits. The Board concluded that Claimant is ineligible
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court agreed with the Workers’ Compensation Judge and the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that the petitioner was subject to an Impairment Rating Evaluation (IRE) under Act 111,
An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined that Appellees were not immune from liability because they did not qualify as statutory employers under the Workers’ Compensation Act
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court reversed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s ruling that Claimant’s injuries were not compensable. Claimant filed a petition seeking total disability benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act for injuries
The Pennsylvania Superior Court quashed an appeal from a workers’ compensation insurer trying to intervene in an action commenced by praecipe for writ of summons. The Court held that the
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered as a matter of first impression the limitations of the general equitable prohibition of an insurer seeking subrogation from its insured. Here, an employee in
The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Division and ruled that Lapsley’s injuries were compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act. Lapsley worked as a librarian at the Sparta Public
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court heard the claimant’s petition for review after a Workers’ Compensation Judge found that the petitioner was “in the course of his employment” when he was injured.
After adverse rulings from a Workers’ Compensation Judge and Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, a claimant petitioned for review in the Commonwealth Court claiming that his employer should not have been
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.