Hocutt v. Manda Supply Co.

The Appellate Division affirmed an order granting summary judgment. Because the plaintiff was a “special employee,” the exclusive remedy for his workplace injury was workers’ compensation. Moreover, the defendant’s alleged conduct was not excepted from workers’ compensation because the conduct was not sufficiently egregious to rise to the level of intentional wrong.

Selective Way Ins. v. MAK Services

#CivilLaw #SummaryJudgment 04/24/2020- MAK Services is exclusively in the business of snow and ice removal. MAK Services obtained liability insurance (“the Policy”) for its operations from Selective Way. The Policy excluded various types of coverage. Among these exclusions was one titled “Exclusion – Snow and Ice Removal.” After an individual slipped and fell at a location that MAK … Read more