Morris v. Rutgers-Newark Univ.
The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed parts of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment because the court mistakenly dismissed some of the plaintiffs’ retaliation claims. The plaintiffs commenced this
The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed parts of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment because the court mistakenly dismissed some of the plaintiffs’ retaliation claims. The plaintiffs commenced this
The Third Circuit affirmed the order that granted summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) in this religious discrimination suit. Groff informed USPS that he was unable
The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the trial court’s summary judgment order in this personal injury case. In August 2012, KnightBrook issued a commercial automobile policy providing liability coverage for
This litigation pitted rival telemarketing firms against one another. The plaintiffs are affiliated companies that sell extended service contracts to motor vehicle owners over the telephone. They claimed that the
The Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated the trial court’s award entered in favor of Hartford. The case stemmed from a motor vehicle accident in which Appellant was injured while operating a
“We only serve Pepsi here.” The Third Circuit ruled that the plaintiff lacked antitrust standing and did not adequately plead a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. After
The Pennsylvania Superior Court determined that the trial court correctly applied Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035.2 in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff sued the defendant,
The Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the doctrine of res judicata barred the plaintiff’s claims. Appellant sought monetary damages against Appellees, including Travelers, Pier 3, Wentworth, and the attorneys who
An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court determined that Appellees were not immune from liability because they did not qualify as statutory employers under the Workers’ Compensation Act
The New Jersey Supreme Court held that, in a New Jersey Civil Rights Act (NJCRA) action, a defendant seeking to challenge a trial court’s order denying qualified immunity prior to
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.