Primmer v. Harrison
The New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s order enforcing the parties’ palimony agreement concerning the dissolution of their relationship. The parties entered into the agreement and abided by
The New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s order enforcing the parties’ palimony agreement concerning the dissolution of their relationship. The parties entered into the agreement and abided by
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the agency’s decision to deny KPMG’s bid protests. The Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (DHS) issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) seeking proposals for comprehensive
The Pennsylvania Superior Court found that the provisions in a lease were ambiguous in this oil and gas lease/breach of contract case. The Dresslers entered into an Oil and Gas
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the parties entered into an enforceable agreement. Smith worked as a president at the Company for 18 years. In2017, he
After a long-standing business relationship soured, the ensuing litigation went big. For years, a vendor provided food services at a private university, but in 2014 the university announced that it
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court reversed the trial court’s order, which granted summary judgment. Capital Blue Cross (“CBC”) employed Evans. CBC provided its employees with short-term disability benefits under its Salary
The Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that Appellant did not justifiably rely on representations made by Appellees. Appellee prepared a one-and-a-half-page prospectus that said a truck stop complex contained a “super volume”
A family squabble ended up as a lesson in contracts taught by the Pennsylvania Superior Court. A father gifted his daughter and son-in-law some land and funded the subdivision of
In this appeal, the New Jersey Appellate Division considered an internet-based company’s method of communicating its terms and conditions in the arena of online consumer contracts. At issue was the
In this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court considered whether an arbitrator’s interpretation of a labor agreement was “reasonably debatable” and should have been upheld on appeal. In 2011, the
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.