Discover Bank v. Booker
Booker appealed the judgment for Discover Bank for $6,765.47 plus interest. The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed. First, Booker alleged the trial court erred in finding an express contract between the
Booker appealed the judgment for Discover Bank for $6,765.47 plus interest. The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed. First, Booker alleged the trial court erred in finding an express contract between the
This consolidated appeal concerned a dispute over the purchase price of shares in two companies. Appellants contended that the Orphans’ Court misinterpreted the Shareholder Agreements, misapplied the law as to
This dispute involved a land transfer. Circle K appealed from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants and argued that the trial court misinterpreted a Right of
In SLT Holdings, LLC v. Mitch-Well Energy, Inc., the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reviewed the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees in their complaint in equity
In Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court confronted an issue of first impression: whether “no-hire” provisions in contracts are enforceable. Here, a transportation logistics
Plaintiff Goldfarb claimed that Defendant Solimine reneged on a promise of employment after Plaintiff quit his job to accept a promised position managing the Defendant’s family’s sizeable investment portfolio. After
In Sullivan v. Max Spann Real Estate & Auction Co., (the Sullivan of Sullivan | Simon, LLC, was not a party), Sullivan hired Max Spann to auction a property. The
In 2303 Bainbridge v. Steel River Building. Sys., the Superior Court held that venue for the parties’ arbitration was proper in Philadelphia Co. because multiple hearings were held there before
In Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch., the PA Supreme Court held that an insurer is permitted to withhold the general contractor’s overhead and profit from any actual cash value payment
In Skuse v. Pfizer, the Supreme Court upheld Pfizer’s arbitration clause, which the company sent via email to its employees. The Court ruled that Pfizer’s communication informed Skuse that if
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.