Kramer v. Nationwide Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co.
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s decision, which ordered Nationwide to provide a defense to the parents in an underlying action concerning a young man’s death. The Kramers’
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s decision, which ordered Nationwide to provide a defense to the parents in an underlying action concerning a young man’s death. The Kramers’
The Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that Appellant did not justifiably rely on representations made by Appellees. Appellee prepared a one-and-a-half-page prospectus that said a truck stop complex contained a “super volume”
Heads up! Plaintiff sued and alleged negligence after she suffered a concussion when an errant soccer ball hit her. Plaintiff based the claim on a coach’s failure to supervise and
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an adverse decision on the government’s assertion of sovereign immunity constitutes a collateral order, immediately appealable as of right under Rule 313. This case
If you are an evidence nerd, you’ll find this opinion to be a treat. Plaintiff 27-35 Jackson Avenue LLC owned commercial property in New York. For no apparent reason, a
Three former Deputy Coroners sued their employer, the County of Schuylkill, claiming the County violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay them overtime and then firing
Brunswick Investment Limited Partnership (“Brunswick”) owned the premises where the plaintiff E.S., guardian ad litem for her two minor daughters, lived. Fred performed maintenance work for Brunswick at the property
Two kids’ charities battled over trademarks. America Can and Kars 4 Kids are charities that sell donated vehicles to fund children’s programs. The charities used similar trademarks. Each sued the
The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s denial of summary judgment in a case where corrections officers “gratuitously beat” a pretrial detainee. Jacobs got into a fight with another inmate
Plaintiff Cindy Johnson brought a civil action for damages resulting from Defendant’s alleged unauthorized practice of law regarding his involvement in Plaintiff’s prior medical malpractice suit. Plaintiff also sought disgorgement
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.