Loftus v. Decker
The Pennsylvania Superior Court quashed an appeal from a workers’ compensation insurer trying to intervene in an action commenced by praecipe for writ of summons. The Court held that the
The Pennsylvania Superior Court quashed an appeal from a workers’ compensation insurer trying to intervene in an action commenced by praecipe for writ of summons. The Court held that the
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered as a matter of first impression the limitations of the general equitable prohibition of an insurer seeking subrogation from its insured. Here, an employee in
An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the order, which denied Claimant’s petition seeking to limit the subrogation interest of Green Acres Contracting Co. (“Employer”) under Section
The Department of Defense awarded a general contracting firm the contract to construct the National Police Command Center in Afghanistan. As is typically required in government contracts, the general contractor
The New Jersey Appellate Division untangled a thorny dispute between an automobile insurer and health insurance provider. Four people who both parties insured suffered injuries as a result of car
In Beaver Valley Slag, Inc. v. Marchionda (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board), Employer, Guardian, and Claimant cross-petitioned the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court to review the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board’s order. Therein, the
In Asbury Park v. Star Ins. Co., a firefighter was justly compensated for his work-related injuries, but the workers’ comp payout caused a fight between Asbury Park and its insurance
NJ Transit paid out a workers’ comp claim to one of its employees who was rear-ended. NJ Transit then sought to recoup the benefits from the at-fault driver’s employer, as
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.