State Farm Ins. Co. v. Kitko
State Farm Ins. Co. v. Kitko involved a dispute over a decedent’s insurance policy. The decedent’s ex-wife and brother both claimed they were the primary beneficiary. On appeal, the ex-wife
State Farm Ins. Co. v. Kitko involved a dispute over a decedent’s insurance policy. The decedent’s ex-wife and brother both claimed they were the primary beneficiary. On appeal, the ex-wife
The Seda-Cog Joint Rail Authority is a joint authority formed under the Municipal Authority Act that is governed by a 16-member board. At a board meeting, six members recused themselves.
In Sivick v. State Ethics Comm’n, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the petitioner’s involvement in approving payroll, which included timesheets for the petitioner’s son, violated Subsection
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Small overruled its prior precedent and tossed the “public record presumption.” Traditionally, a defendant, who filed a PCRA petition, could circumvent the statutory one-year
In Gustafson v. Springfield, while he with a gun, one juvenile shot and killed his young friend. The deceased boy’s parents sued the gun manufacturer and alleged that, under the common law
In Commonwealth v. Gurung, the Superior Court held that a motorist’s failure to use his turn signal while switching lanes was sufficient evidence to establish probable cause for a traffic
In Nicole B. v. School Dist. of Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission’s equitable tolling provision applied to a minor whose parent failed to satisfy
In A.A. v. Att’y Gen. United States, the 3rd Circuit interpreted the phrase “undesignated terrorist organizations” of the Immigration and Nationality Act to affirm the denial of the petitioner’s asylum.
In Commonwealth v. Nevels, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the statute criminalizing retaliation against a witness applies to retaliation against a witness or victim in either a civil or
In Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the 2008 amendments to the Pennsylvania Loan Interest & Protection Law — which govern residential mortgages
Copyright Sullivan Legal Writing Services
All rights reserved.