United States v. Adams
The Speedy Trial Act requires that a criminal defendant be tried within seventy days of arraignment or indictment or to have all charges dismissed. The defendant here was not tried
The Speedy Trial Act requires that a criminal defendant be tried within seventy days of arraignment or indictment or to have all charges dismissed. The defendant here was not tried
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed an order from the Court of Common Pleas that granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges based on the Commonwealth’s violation of Rule 600(c). The
The Third Circuit affirmed the defendant’s convictions for conspiracy, fraud, embezzlement, and other crimes. The defendant owned a for-profit education company through which he contracted with the School District of
The New Jersey Appellate Division dealt with two speedy trial issues under the Criminal Justice Reform Act. First, the Court reviewed the application of the 180-day extension of time to
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a critical ruling for criminal defendants when it held “that a trial court may invoke ‘judicial delay’ to deny a defendant’s Rule 600 motion to
In United States v. Shulik, the defendant, whose co-conspirator was Chaka Fattah, Jr., appealed his convictions of conspiracy, embezzlement, and fraud charges. He alleged several errors, ranging from speedy trial
In Commonwealth v. Risoldi, the Superior Court vacated the defendant’s conviction for theft by deception, ruling the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The Court also affirmed the denial
In Commonwealth v. Tallley, the Superior Court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for stalking and related crimes. On appeal, the defendant unsuccessfully argued that the trial court erred when: 1. it
In State v. Williams, the State appealed the trial court’s order, which granted the defendant’s pretrial release. The trial court found that the State’s repeated failure to comply with the
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.