Ryan v. Ruize
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed an order of the Court of Common Pleas that permitted the defendant’s licensed clinical social worker to testify about a statement he made during a
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed an order of the Court of Common Pleas that permitted the defendant’s licensed clinical social worker to testify about a statement he made during a
The Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a 150-day flat sentence imposed for a violation of a protection from abuse (“PFA”) order. The Court cited its decision in Wagner v. Wagner, where
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a petition seeking a protective order under the Protection of Victims of Sexual Violence or Intimidation Act (“PVSVIA”) is subject to a six-year statute
The appellant challenged a protection from abuse (PFA) order that compelled him to avoid a particular temple on Sundays when his ex-wife worshiped there. He claimed that the PFA unlawfully
Flower appealed the trial court’s order, which found him in violation of a protection from abuse order. He argued that the trial court abused its discretion by finding him in
In E.K. v. J.R.A., the Superior Court dealt with two interrelated orders. The Court ruled the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a PFA, finding that Mother
The Superior Court ruled in B.R.S. v. J.L. that a petitioner had standing to seek a protection from abuse order against his wife’s sister’s husband, as the two were related by
The Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s grant of a PFA, holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the trial court’s conclusion by a preponderance of the evidence that Nabiyev
R.G. appealed from the trial court’s Protection from Abuse Order, alleging the evidence was insufficient. The Superior Court disagreed and affirmed.
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.