Commonwealth v. Moose
Commonwealth v. Moose is another decision of the Pennsylvania appellate courts concerning Subchapters H and I of SORNA. In 1995, the defendant entered a negotiated guilty plea to third-degree murder,
Commonwealth v. Moose is another decision of the Pennsylvania appellate courts concerning Subchapters H and I of SORNA. In 1995, the defendant entered a negotiated guilty plea to third-degree murder,
In Commonwealth v. Leone, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the defendant’s designation as a sexually violent predator (SVP) was constitutional. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court previously held in Commonwealth v.
In 1994, the defendant entered a guilty plea to kidnapping a minor and has long since served his sentence. In 2019, he filed a coram nobis petition challenging his sex
The defendant filed a petition seeking collateral relief from his criminal convictions pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act. He claimed that his sentence to lifetime registration under Act 10
Hromek appealed the denial of his challenge to the legality of his sentence via a “Petition for Enforcement of Plea Agreement.” The Superior Court treated the Petition as a PCRA
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.