State v. Caronna
The New Jersey Appellate Division aptly summed up the question answered in this lengthy opinion: Does the exclusionary rule under the New Jersey Constitution apply to an unconstitutional and flagrant
November 3, 2021
The New Jersey Appellate Division aptly summed up the question answered in this lengthy opinion: Does the exclusionary rule under the New Jersey Constitution apply to an unconstitutional and flagrant
In Commonwealth v. Tillery, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed an order from the Court of Common Pleas granting the defendant’s motion to suppress. Police officers pulled the defendant over for
In Commonwealth v. Mason, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered whether the Commonwealth was permitted to introduce audio recordings captured by a “nanny cam” that was surreptitiously installed in a child’s
In Commonwealth v. Grooms, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed an order from the trial court denying the defendant’s motion to suppress drugs found in his car after a warrantless search.
In Commonwealth v. Copenhaver, the Superior Court revisited this case for the second time after the Supreme Court reversed and remanded. On remand, the Superior Court held that a sheriff’s
In Commonwealth v. Gaston, the defendant’s DUI prosecution was in the pretrial stage when the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Birchfield v. North Dakota. The defendant moved to
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.