Tag: #Crimmigration

State v. Francisco

The New Jersey Appellate Division issued a rare analysis of what has become known as “crimmigration”. The opinion is a worthwhile read for criminal and immigration attorneys. In this case,

Read More »

Aristy-Rosa v. Att’y Gen. of U.S.

The Third Circuit granted the Government’s request to publish its earlier non-precedential opinion in Aristy-Rosa v. Att’y Gen. of U.S. The petitioner was ordered removed because he was a lawful

Read More »

Sunuwar v. Att’y Gen.

In Sunuwar v. Att’y Gen., an immigration judge ruled that the petitioner was removable as an alien who was convicted of an aggravated felony, a crime of domestic violence and

Read More »

Rad v. Att’y Gen. United States

In Rad v. Att’y Gen. United States, the defendant appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals’ finding that his violations of the CAN-SPAM Act necessarily entailed deceit, and therefore satisfied the

Read More »

Khan v. Att’y Gen.

Khan v. Att’y Gen. was an appeal of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order, which denied Khan’s petition for cancellation of removal. The 3rd Circuit denied Khan’s petition to review

Read More »

Martinez v. Att’y Gen.

In Martinez v. Att’y Gen., the 3rd Circuit employed the categorical approach in holding that the New Jersey state offense of criminal sexual contact, N.J.S.A. § 2C:14-3(b), constitutes sexual abuse of

Read More »

Mirambeaux v. Att’y Gen.

In Mirambeaux v. Att’y Gen., the Board of Immigration of Appeals ruled that the petitioner was convicted of an aggravated felony and thus ineligible for withholding of removal. The petitioner

Read More »

Hernandez-Morales v. Att’y Gen.

In Hernandez-Morales v. Att’y Gen., the 3rd Circuit held that Hernandez-Morales was “dressing up” discretionary rulings made by an immigration judge as well as the Board of Immigration Appeals as

Read More »

Abdulla v. U.S. Att’y Gen.

In Abdulla v. U.S. Att’y Gen., the Third Circuit joined the 2nd, 8th, 9th, as well as 10th circuits and held that the Court did not have jurisdiction to review

Read More »

State v. Aburoumi

In State v. Aburoumi, which involved a collateral attack on a criminal conviction, the Appellate Division ruled that an evidentiary hearing was needed where the defendant claimed he was not

Read More »

Search entire site by keyword...

Search for Summaries by Hashtag...

Past Opinion Summaries