Boley v. Universal Health Svs.
In this interlocutory appeal, fiduciaries of a retirement plan appealed the District Court’s certification of a class of participants who alleged the fiduciaries breached their duty under the Employee Retirement
In this interlocutory appeal, fiduciaries of a retirement plan appealed the District Court’s certification of a class of participants who alleged the fiduciaries breached their duty under the Employee Retirement
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court dismissed this putative class action. Petitioners purported to bring a class action on behalf of themselves and as representatives of 3,000 other political subdivisions which might
The Third Circuit ruled that Defendants timely removed this case. Plaintiffs purchased notary services at UPS stores in New Jersey. They filed two separate putative class action complaints in NJ
A putative class of individuals who have licenses to carry firearms sued their county and sheriff, claiming that the defendants violated the privacy provision of the Uniform Firearms Act, found
Civil procedure gone awry. Twelve mortgage loan officers claimed that Citizens Bank forced them—and more than a thousand of their colleagues—to work over forty hours a week without paying them
The Third Circuit reversed the District Court’s order that certified an “issue class” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(4). The defendant is a nonprofit agency that certifies graduates
This case arose out of a class-action suit for unpaid wages brought by employees at an Amazon warehouse. The employees claimed they were entitled to compensation under the Pennsylvania Minimum
This was an appeal from the District Court’s order dismissing the complaint filed by individual shareholders of Valeant Pharmaceuticals Inc. as untimely. A class action was filed against Valeant on
In Baskin v. P.C. Richard & Son, LLC, a putative class action, the New Jersey Supreme Court reversed an order from the Chancery Division granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss
In Branch v. Cream-O-Land Dairy, an employee sued his employer under the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a to -56a38 because the employee thought he was entitled to
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.