Search:
Weekly Caselaw Updates

Sign up here to receive a weekly email with summaries of every precedential case out of the Third Circuit and the appellate courts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. No fluff. No filler. No fee.

Hassan v. Williams

New Jersey Appellate Division

April 13, 2021

In Hassan v. Williams, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a must-read opinion, which touched on several evidentiary issues. The Court reviewed a defense-favorable verdict after a rear-end crash involving two commercial trucks. At the trial, the plaintiff sought to introduce testimony from the defendant’s deposition in which he said that rear-ending someone “automatically makes you wrong.” The plaintiff also sought to introduce a letter in which the defendant’s employer stated that the accident was “preventable” and that his “recklessness” caused the crash. The trial court excluded the evidence — and some similar evidence — because it went to the “ultimate issue”. The Court reversed, noting that Rule 704 abolished the “ultimate issue” rule so long as the evidence sought to be introduced is “otherwise admissible”. The Court disagreed with the trial court about whether the evidence was hearsay and ruled the evidence was admissible under  Rule 803(b) as statements made by a party opponent.

Scroll down to read the court's full opinion
IF YOU HAVE ANY OF THESE

Heavy Workload

Heavy Workload

 Vacation

Vacation

 Other<br />Personal<br />Commitments

Other
Personal
Commitments

Hiring Attorney Contact Us
Sullivan Simon
Attorneys with 20+ years of litigation experience.

requests basic information
about case
Within 24 hours,

flat-fee quote

Delivers Final
Product
  • On Time
  • On Budget
  • Ready to File