In Allen v. Cape May Co., Plaintiff sued and alleged that Defendants retaliated against her for engaging in Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA)-protected activity arising from two incidents. The New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment as to one incident. However, regarding the other incident, the Court remanded to the trial court because it was unclear whether Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was decided based on the CEPA provision on which Plaintiff relied.
