Skip to content
Sullivan | Simon, LLC
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • OPINIONS
  • ARTICLES
  • GHOSTWRITING
  • CONTACT

Satiro v. Maninno

September 28, 2020August 7, 2020

In Satiro v. Maninno, the Superior Court found the pro se appellant’s claim waived as a result of filing a 29-issue statement of matters complained of on appeal that made it impossible for the trial court to give a comprehensive analysis of the issues.

SATIRO

Categories Pennsylvania Superior Court Tags #1925Statement, #AppellateLaw, #AppellateProcedure, #Waiver
Post navigation
Commonwealth v. Bradley
Commonwealth v. Webb

STAY INFORMED

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Tags

#1stAmendment #4thAmendment #1983 #AdministrativeLaw #AppellateProcedure #Arbitration #AttorneyFees #CivilLaw #CivPro #ClassAction #Contracts #CriminalLaw #CrimPro #DueProcess #DUI #DWI #EmploymentLaw #Evidence #ExpertTestimony #FamilyLaw #Habeas #Hearsay #Immigration #IneffectiveAssistance #InsuranceDispute #Jurisdiction #MedMal #MegansLaw #Negligence #PCRA #PersonalInjury #RealEstateLaw #RealProperty #Search&Seizure #Sentencing #SORNA #Standing #StatutoryInterpretation #Sufficiency #SummaryJudgment #Suppression #TaxLaw #Torts #Waiver #WorkersComp

Recent Posts

  • United States v. Aguirre-Miron
  • Office of General Counsel v. Bumsted
  • Commonwealth v. Carter
  • Commonwealth v. Hudson-Greenly
  • Cease v. Hous. Auth. of Indiana Co.

STAY INFORMED

SIGN UP HERE FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER WITH SUMMARIES OF ALL THE PAST WEEK'S PRECEDENTIAL OPINIONS FROM THE STATE COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY AS WELL AS THE OPINIONS FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

FOLLOW MATT

FOLLOW DAVID

Sullivan | Simon, LLC
Camden Law Building
330 Market Street
Camden, New Jersey 08102
p. 856-685-8960
f. 267-200-0119
[email protected]

© 2020 Sullivan | Simon, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Website by J2 Technology SOLUTIONS LLC