Search:
Weekly Caselaw Updates

Sign up here to receive a weekly email with summaries of every precedential case out of the Third Circuit and the appellate courts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. No fluff. No filler. No fee.

In re M.R.

Pennsylvania Superior Court

March 1, 2021

In re M.R. involved consolidated appeals in which the Philadelphia Department of Human Services (“DHS”) appealed from the orders adjudicating dependent M.R. and his twin sister, J.R. (collectively, “Children”), but not finding child abuse as to the parents. At issue in the appeals was whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the testimony of the parents’ expert witness, Dr. Miller. The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed. The Court ruled that the mere fact of publication of Dr. Miller’s research in a journal did not prove that doctors and scientists in the medical field generally accepted his scientific methodology as a means for arriving at a conclusion about the cause of Children’s injuries. There were a plethora of other sources discrediting Dr. Miller’s methodology. Furthermore, the trial court abused its discretion in ascertaining that Dr. Miller applied a generally accepted scientific methodology simply because he claimed to have used medical records, diagnostic imaging, and the medical histories of both Children and Mother. Accordingly, the trial court should not have admitted the doctor’s testimony.

Scroll down to read the court's full opinion
IF YOU HAVE ANY OF THESE

Heavy Workload

Heavy Workload

 Vacation

Vacation

 Other<br />Personal<br />Commitments

Other
Personal
Commitments

Hiring Attorney Contact Us
Sullivan Simon
Attorneys with 20+ years of litigation experience.

requests basic information
about case
Within 24 hours,

flat-fee quote

Delivers Final
Product
  • On Time
  • On Budget
  • Ready to File