In Charlton v. Troy, a medical malpractice case, the Superior Court held that the plaintiffs’ use of a textbook to cross-examine a defense doctor was improper and highly prejudicial.
In Charlton v. Troy, a medical malpractice case, the Superior Court held that the plaintiffs’ use of a textbook to cross-examine a defense doctor was improper and highly prejudicial.
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.