State v. Marias

The State indicted the defendant on a charge of first-degree money laundering offense, under a theory that the “amount involved” exceeded $500,000. The defendant moved to amend the indictment to a third-degree offense, arguing, because he received $63,000 for the merchandise he was able to sell, that sum constituted the “amount involved.” The trial court calculated the amount involved to be $283,500. The State appealed. The Appellate Division reversed.


The Court ruled that there were reasonable grounds for a jury to decide that the fair market value of the goods that the defendant was able to sell exceeded the $500,000 first-degree threshold. Moreover, it was reasonably conceivable that the State will persuade the jury that the replacement cost of the items the defendant sold was as much as $546,000 (i.e., $1.946 million minus $1.4 million), and a jury reasonably could find that the fair market value of the goods sold exceeded their replacement cost.

MARIAS

Search entire site by keyword...

Search for Summaries by Hashtag...

Past Opinion Summaries