An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed an order from the Court of Common Pleas that granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on a claim for intentional interference with her at-will employment contract. The plaintiff was a salaried accountant for Drexel University but was fired due to her performance. She sued her supervisor and the University, alleging that the supervisor created an untenable work environment. The en banc panel relied on the Restatements (2nd) of Torts ยง 766 in holding that intentional interference claims for an at-will employee are available to prospective employees, not existing employees. Because the plaintiff was an existing at-will employee at the time of her termination, her claim could not stand, and the Court affirmed the order granting summary judgment.