Commonwealth v. Luster

The Superior Court vacated Luster’s convictions for IDSI, unlawful contact with a minor, etc. and remanded the case for a new trial, holding that the Commonwealth’s late notice—the day of trial—of invocation of evidence pursuant to the TenderYears Hearsay Act was insufficient. Therefore, the trial court’s erred when it overruled Luster’s objection and permitted the Commonwealth to introduce the evidence.

LUSTER