Search:
Weekly Caselaw Updates

Sign up here to receive a weekly email with summaries of every precedential case out of the Third Circuit and the appellate courts in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. No fluff. No filler. No fee.

Commonwealth v. Koehler

Pennsylvania Supreme Court

April 24, 2020

This case presents plenty of intrigue for appellate law experts. A special panel of judges was convened pursuant to the Rules of Judicial Administration to deal with a PCRA petitioner’s appeal. During the PCRA petitioner’s appeal from the denial of his first PCRA petition, Justice Eakin joined the majority to deny relief. In that case, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that penalty-phase counsel was not ineffective for failing to pursue mitigating evidence regarding the presence of domestic violence in the petitioner’s upbringing. After that ruling, news articles brought to light certain emails of Justice Eakin that arguably showed his indifference to domestic violence. In the instant PCRA petition, the accused claimed that his due process rights were violated in that earlier appeal because Justice Eakin participated in the case. The PCRA court did all that it could to avoid reaching the issue, essentially claiming that a trial-level judge could not rule on an appellate jurist’s behavior. The PA Supreme Court disagreed and found the issue presented, though novel, was not unlike any other claim of judicial bias. The case was remanded for further proceedings.

Majority: https://bit.ly/2VW18Jo
Concurring & Dissenting: https://bit.ly/3fftjul
Concurring: https://bit.ly/3aZ4nnp

Scroll down to read the court's full opinion
IF YOU HAVE ANY OF THESE

Heavy Workload

Heavy Workload

 Vacation

Vacation

 Other<br />Personal<br />Commitments

Other
Personal
Commitments

Hiring Attorney Contact Us
Sullivan Simon
Attorneys with 20+ years of litigation experience.

requests basic information
about case
Within 24 hours,

flat-fee quote

Delivers Final
Product
  • On Time
  • On Budget
  • Ready to File