B.B. v. Mell

In B.B. v. Mell, after Mell was convicted in a federal criminal court for victimizing B.B., who was 15 years old, B.B. sued Mell for damages and quickly sought a prejudgment writ of attachment of Mell’s vast assets. After the trial court entered an order compelling the payment of $26,026.50 to Mell’s attorney from B.B.’s attorney’s trust account, B.B. appealed. The Appellate Division held that Mell did not have a legal or equitable right to the payment of his counsel fees–incurred in a civil action brought by his victim–from funds that had been attached for his victim’s benefit. The Court concluded that B.B. had a higher priority to the attached funds than Mell or his attorney; that nothing in the statutes or rules governing attachment actions creates an exception from attachment for a defendant’s counsel fees; and that neither Mell his attorney demonstrated an equitable right to the attached funds greater than B.B.’s right to the security provided by the attachment.

Search entire site by keyword...

Search for Summaries by Hashtag...

Past Opinion Summaries