Commonwealth v. Burton

Burton appealed after a jury convicted him of drug delivery resulting in death (DDRD). On appeal he challenged the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his DDRD conviction in light of his acquittal of reckless endangerment (REAP), contending the guilty verdict for DDRD is inconsistent with his acquittal of REAP. The court held that the inconsistent verdicts we not problematic. Second, the Court upheld the trial court’s order, which denied Burton’s motion to suppress cell site location information (CCSLI).