Hopkins v. Collecto, Inc.
In the first paragraph of the opinion in Hopkins v. Collecto, Inc., the Third Circuit noted that the hypothetical least sophisticated consumer “is not a litigious claim-seeker who hunts, Lagotto-like, for
In the first paragraph of the opinion in Hopkins v. Collecto, Inc., the Third Circuit noted that the hypothetical least sophisticated consumer “is not a litigious claim-seeker who hunts, Lagotto-like, for
In Hamer v. Livanova Deutschland GMBH, KFA, Plaintiff filed a claim in the Eastern District of Louisiana (EDLa) alleging injuries due to Defendant’s failure to warn, inadequate product design, and
In re Energy Future Holdings Group arose from the bankruptcy of Energy Future Holdings and its affiliates (“Debtors”). The Debtors’ most valuable asset was a significant economic interest in Texas’s
In Martinez v. UPMC Susquehanna, the plaintiff doctor sued after he was fired without much explanation and replaced by two younger doctors. The District Court dismissed his age-discrimination suit, treating
In Commonwealth v. Kemick, the Superior Court first determined that the trial court’s oder, denying Kemick’s motion to dismiss the charges based on double jeopardy, was collateral and, thus, appealable. The
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.