Morales-Hurtado v. Reinoso

#ExpertTestimony #CivPro

The Supreme Court affirmed per curium based on the Appellate Division’s opinion, but wrote to emphasize the trial court’s erroneous application of NJRE 802 & 703 to the of the proposed expert testimony of a life care planner. Though some of the information the proposed expert was to rely on was not certified to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, the Supreme Court noted that did not mean that all of the proposed testimony was inadmissible.