May v. Doe
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court quashed a pro se appeal from the trial court’s order sustaining the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections’ (DOC) Preliminary Objections. May filed a grievance with the DOC,
February 17, 2022
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court quashed a pro se appeal from the trial court’s order sustaining the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections’ (DOC) Preliminary Objections. May filed a grievance with the DOC,
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued a high-profile opinion holding a Philadelphia ordinance unconstitutional. The regulation required gun owners to tell law enforcement when their gun was lost or stolen. The
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court addressed an issue of first impression involving venue in an action where the Commonwealth is a defendant. The plaintiff drove off the road in a construction
A divided panel of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that Act 77 — which established that any qualified elector may vote by mail — violated the Pennsylvania Constitution and is
An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court denied the petitioner’s application for removal from Pennsylvania’s sex offender registry. The petitioner challenged the application of Subchapter I of SORNA
An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed the order, which denied Claimant’s petition seeking to limit the subrogation interest of Green Acres Contracting Co. (“Employer”) under Section
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court affirmed an order of the Board of Veterinary Medicine’s order that essentially held that an animal chiropractor is practicing veterinary medicine under the Veterinary Medicine Practice
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court heard the claimant’s petition for review after a Workers’ Compensation Judge found that the petitioner was “in the course of his employment” when he was injured.
An en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that a school district’s decision to expel G.S. violated his constitutionally protected right to free speech. G.S.’s expulsion resulted from
After adverse rulings from a Workers’ Compensation Judge and Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, a claimant petitioned for review in the Commonwealth Court claiming that his employer should not have been
Copyright Sullivan Simon.
All rights reserved.